Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
What do you think about this ?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mugsy" data-source="post: 1841496" data-attributes="member: 18914"><p>I have always supported the idea of presidential candidates making, at least tentative, cabinet appointment announcements before the election.</p><p>It would definitely be of benefit to the voters. </p><p>I think the main issue is that it would give too much opportunity to the opposing candidate's operatives to dig-up dirt that could be extremely damaging to a candidate during the election. I mean finding out that your attorney general candidate, for example, employed illegal aliens to work his house/ as nanny etc after the election is embarrassing but during the election could be a (electorally) fatal distraction.</p><p></p><p>Maybe a much shorter election cycle - say 12 weeks total - with announcements one week before the general election might minimize the opportunity for dirty politics to take over.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mugsy, post: 1841496, member: 18914"] I have always supported the idea of presidential candidates making, at least tentative, cabinet appointment announcements before the election. It would definitely be of benefit to the voters. I think the main issue is that it would give too much opportunity to the opposing candidate's operatives to dig-up dirt that could be extremely damaging to a candidate during the election. I mean finding out that your attorney general candidate, for example, employed illegal aliens to work his house/ as nanny etc after the election is embarrassing but during the election could be a (electorally) fatal distraction. Maybe a much shorter election cycle - say 12 weeks total - with announcements one week before the general election might minimize the opportunity for dirty politics to take over. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
What do you think about this ?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom