Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
What does the second ammendment mean to you?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jgibs0321" data-source="post: 3728295" data-attributes="member: 49409"><p>To me, as one of many who carried SBRs, suppressors, autos, and belt fed MGs, I think its silly that civilians who love the nation and serve it in their own unique capacity, cannot be armed and ready to protect our critical infrastructure and way of life in the event serious threats arise. Should you have grenades and rockets and artillery? Mmm maybe not. But then again, those of us who know how to implement a long list of things still dont use those skills to do evil, so why would we if you have me some 40mm HE in a launcher? Or an AT4 if you afford the suckers. The old men wrote the constitution based on Christianity being oppressed by a crappy government (dont confuse their use of religion as a blanket for islamists and anarchists), and they endured wars firsthand to understand what was at stake. Now we have people talking about hunting with modern guns. My ARs are for fighting and it just so happens that I hunt with them also. But back in the day, they used those blackpowders for everything so nothing has changed in that principle. Disarm the threat, be armed yourself, you hold the power in the physical. So I hope more Americans will arm themselves to the teeth and find some good infantrymen or special operations backed people and get trained in the basics of gunning. Lets go brandon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jgibs0321, post: 3728295, member: 49409"] To me, as one of many who carried SBRs, suppressors, autos, and belt fed MGs, I think its silly that civilians who love the nation and serve it in their own unique capacity, cannot be armed and ready to protect our critical infrastructure and way of life in the event serious threats arise. Should you have grenades and rockets and artillery? Mmm maybe not. But then again, those of us who know how to implement a long list of things still dont use those skills to do evil, so why would we if you have me some 40mm HE in a launcher? Or an AT4 if you afford the suckers. The old men wrote the constitution based on Christianity being oppressed by a crappy government (dont confuse their use of religion as a blanket for islamists and anarchists), and they endured wars firsthand to understand what was at stake. Now we have people talking about hunting with modern guns. My ARs are for fighting and it just so happens that I hunt with them also. But back in the day, they used those blackpowders for everything so nothing has changed in that principle. Disarm the threat, be armed yourself, you hold the power in the physical. So I hope more Americans will arm themselves to the teeth and find some good infantrymen or special operations backed people and get trained in the basics of gunning. Lets go brandon. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
What does the second ammendment mean to you?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom