Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
What gives with this guy wanting to kill the arts in OK?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="n2sooners" data-source="post: 2086460" data-attributes="member: 26539"><p>Privatizing education doesn't mean no one could afford it. We could switch to a voucher system and then private schools would compete for the money. It would be run much more efficiently since they would have to do as good a job as possible as inexpensively as possible.</p><p></p><p>As for art, the government spending itself into bankruptcy because it is paying for things it shouldn't be paying for at all doesn't make us a more enlightened society, it makes us stupid. Just because the government doesn't pay for something doesn't mean it will cease to exist, and if it does then it probably wasn't worth keeping anyway. People who want to subsidize art should do so, they shouldn't use the government to steal and borrow away their children's future to make it happen.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="n2sooners, post: 2086460, member: 26539"] Privatizing education doesn't mean no one could afford it. We could switch to a voucher system and then private schools would compete for the money. It would be run much more efficiently since they would have to do as good a job as possible as inexpensively as possible. As for art, the government spending itself into bankruptcy because it is paying for things it shouldn't be paying for at all doesn't make us a more enlightened society, it makes us stupid. Just because the government doesn't pay for something doesn't mean it will cease to exist, and if it does then it probably wasn't worth keeping anyway. People who want to subsidize art should do so, they shouldn't use the government to steal and borrow away their children's future to make it happen. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
What gives with this guy wanting to kill the arts in OK?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom