Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
What gives with this guy wanting to kill the arts in OK?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="henschman" data-source="post: 2090207" data-attributes="member: 4235"><p>But how much would that money have produced for its owners if it had not been seized by the state and spent on arts? It is likely that it would have produced an even greater return... but we will never know. This is the fallacious argument always raised in defense of subsidies. It never takes into account what would have happened if the resources were allocated to the things the owners thought were the most efficient uses, instead of the bureaucrats' pet projects; the investments, goods, structures, and business ventures that were never allowed to exist because of government intervention. </p><p></p><p>Speaking of gov't schools, Frederic Bastiat's treatise "What is Seen and What is Not Seen" should be required reading as long as we are going to have such institutions.</p><p></p><p> And plus I doubt those numbers are correct about how many dollars would be lost, as they are basing their projections on the entire Oklahoma art industry ceasing to be; which is not even close to what will happen if subsidies are ended.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="henschman, post: 2090207, member: 4235"] But how much would that money have produced for its owners if it had not been seized by the state and spent on arts? It is likely that it would have produced an even greater return... but we will never know. This is the fallacious argument always raised in defense of subsidies. It never takes into account what would have happened if the resources were allocated to the things the owners thought were the most efficient uses, instead of the bureaucrats' pet projects; the investments, goods, structures, and business ventures that were never allowed to exist because of government intervention. Speaking of gov't schools, Frederic Bastiat's treatise "What is Seen and What is Not Seen" should be required reading as long as we are going to have such institutions. And plus I doubt those numbers are correct about how many dollars would be lost, as they are basing their projections on the entire Oklahoma art industry ceasing to be; which is not even close to what will happen if subsidies are ended. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
What gives with this guy wanting to kill the arts in OK?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom