Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
What have you done to prepare today?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="onearmedman" data-source="post: 1300673" data-attributes="member: 454"><p>Soviet doctrine called for targeting any runway <7000ft (min takeoff/land for B52). That made the airport in Pueblo, CO a target of all places. With less reliance on slow, out-of-date bombers and more focus on SLBMs, they may have changed their thinking. However, we used to "disperse" SAC assets to more remote strips to make it harder to kill them all. Do you expect the Navy at TAFB to stay there if they could relocate to lower risk areas?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="onearmedman, post: 1300673, member: 454"] Soviet doctrine called for targeting any runway <7000ft (min takeoff/land for B52). That made the airport in Pueblo, CO a target of all places. With less reliance on slow, out-of-date bombers and more focus on SLBMs, they may have changed their thinking. However, we used to "disperse" SAC assets to more remote strips to make it harder to kill them all. Do you expect the Navy at TAFB to stay there if they could relocate to lower risk areas? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
What have you done to prepare today?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
