Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
What is the state law on producing I.D. on demand from law enforcement
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 4109676" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>Because you have not adequately explained the situation. I asked specific questions and other than the insurance, you didn't answer them. Why is that? </p><p></p><p>You inferred that you were in jeopardy of owing Plaintiff Deadbeat $17M personally. Is that actually true? If so, how did your QI from civil tort get denied by the courts? That is the first defense against a 1983 suit, is it not? Even if that happened, as often as a frivolous suit goes to trial they get dismissed for cause, sometimes with prejudice if they're so frivolous as you say yours was. Was your counsel ineffective, or just soaking the insurance company for fees?</p><p></p><p>Also, who does Plaintiff Deadbeat owe attorney's fees and other costs to? You? Your legal team? Your insurance company? Is there somewhere we can read the case transcripts?</p><p></p><p>Finally, did this happen in Colorado or Connecticut? I ask because their state laws differ from ours. </p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.ncsl.org/civil-and-criminal-justice/qualified-immunity#:~:text=In%201967%2C%20the%20Supreme%20Court,%27t%20%E2%80%9Cclearly%20established.%E2%80%9D[/URL]</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/qualified_immunity[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 4109676, member: 1132"] Because you have not adequately explained the situation. I asked specific questions and other than the insurance, you didn't answer them. Why is that? You inferred that you were in jeopardy of owing Plaintiff Deadbeat $17M personally. Is that actually true? If so, how did your QI from civil tort get denied by the courts? That is the first defense against a 1983 suit, is it not? Even if that happened, as often as a frivolous suit goes to trial they get dismissed for cause, sometimes with prejudice if they're so frivolous as you say yours was. Was your counsel ineffective, or just soaking the insurance company for fees? Also, who does Plaintiff Deadbeat owe attorney's fees and other costs to? You? Your legal team? Your insurance company? Is there somewhere we can read the case transcripts? Finally, did this happen in Colorado or Connecticut? I ask because their state laws differ from ours. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.ncsl.org/civil-and-criminal-justice/qualified-immunity#:~:text=In%201967%2C%20the%20Supreme%20Court,%27t%20%E2%80%9Cclearly%20established.%E2%80%9D[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/qualified_immunity[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
What is the state law on producing I.D. on demand from law enforcement
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom