Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
What the Hell?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rod Snell" data-source="post: 1552812" data-attributes="member: 796"><p>IANAL. It looks like OK law opens the door to investigate whether the gun in question is legally owned, and a felon in possession of a handgun is clearly in violation of 1289.7 and subject to arrest in OK. So the same stop in OK could have ended the same, apparently.</p><p>I don't see the NM case as being much different than the Murphy case already decided by SCOTUS, wherein an officer is allowed to temporarily take custody of weapons and investigate whether a crime has been committed. </p><p>Presumably, had no crime been committed, the gun would have been returned; is there any reason to think otherwise in this case?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rod Snell, post: 1552812, member: 796"] IANAL. It looks like OK law opens the door to investigate whether the gun in question is legally owned, and a felon in possession of a handgun is clearly in violation of 1289.7 and subject to arrest in OK. So the same stop in OK could have ended the same, apparently. I don't see the NM case as being much different than the Murphy case already decided by SCOTUS, wherein an officer is allowed to temporarily take custody of weapons and investigate whether a crime has been committed. Presumably, had no crime been committed, the gun would have been returned; is there any reason to think otherwise in this case? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
What the Hell?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom