Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
What the Hell?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BadgeBunny" data-source="post: 1555531" data-attributes="member: 1242"><p>The interpretation of the SDA statute and Ohio v. Terry have been hashed out on this board more times than Carter has little liver pills and the end result is always the same. Neither of them give a conceal carry holder an absolute right to refuse an officer's request to relinquish a firearm.</p><p></p><p>Quoted because I couldn't say it any better:</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Whether or not you think an officer should disarm someone on a stop, or it makes you uncomfortable, is completely irrelevant to the issue. As long as an officer can articulate their reasoning behind a request (and I don't mean to you in the middle of a stop) then the request is lawful and should be obeyed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BadgeBunny, post: 1555531, member: 1242"] The interpretation of the SDA statute and Ohio v. Terry have been hashed out on this board more times than Carter has little liver pills and the end result is always the same. Neither of them give a conceal carry holder an absolute right to refuse an officer's request to relinquish a firearm. Quoted because I couldn't say it any better: Whether or not you think an officer should disarm someone on a stop, or it makes you uncomfortable, is completely irrelevant to the issue. As long as an officer can articulate their reasoning behind a request (and I don't mean to you in the middle of a stop) then the request is lawful and should be obeyed. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
What the Hell?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom