Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Aries" data-source="post: 4010563" data-attributes="member: 44328">I did look at their website and that was one of the ones I liked.&nbsp; I was struggling between the quartz and powermatic, I like not having to replace a battery but my impression from reading is that quartz is more accurate?&nbsp; Or is there any significant difference?It&#039;s hard to find accuracy ratings on specific models of watches, but I found one for some Seiko I looked at that said 15 seconds a month + or - is typical, and I found one for a Tissot that said .3 minus to .5 seconds plus per day.&nbsp; My very poor OSU graduate level math says .5 seconds per day works out to about 15 seconds per month.&nbsp; The VAST majority of watches I looked at, I couldn&#039;t find specific info.&nbsp; I was kind of concluding that accuracy wasn&#039;t a big factor in the decision.&nbsp; Tissot was leading based on recommendation in this thread, and just some desire to have something differrent.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Aries, post: 4010563, member: 44328"] I did look at their website and that was one of the ones I liked. I was struggling between the quartz and powermatic, I like not having to replace a battery but my impression from reading is that quartz is more accurate? Or is there any significant difference? It's hard to find accuracy ratings on specific models of watches, but I found one for some Seiko I looked at that said 15 seconds a month + or - is typical, and I found one for a Tissot that said .3 minus to .5 seconds plus per day. My very poor OSU graduate level math says .5 seconds per day works out to about 15 seconds per month. The VAST majority of watches I looked at, I couldn't find specific info. I was kind of concluding that accuracy wasn't a big factor in the decision. Tissot was leading based on recommendation in this thread, and just some desire to have something differrent. [/QUOTE]

Verification