Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Who Defends Our Right to Free Speech?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 1910964" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p><strong>You. Don't. Get. It.</strong> You talk about holding people responsible, and then completely ignore the <em>fact</em> that the people doing the rioting and killing are sentient actors. As GTG pointed out, cattle and dogs are not responsible for their actions because they're not sentient. Actually, he's only half-right: both can be trained. If you mean to suggest that the Muslim population, or some segment of it, is somewhere below the intellectual level of my walking steak dinner, then so state; as for myself, I believe that they're perfectly capable of choosing their actions. That makes them responsible for what they do, regardless of the provocation.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Wow. Moral equivalency in its purest form. You really think murder is an acceptable response to words? How about shoving young girls into burning buildings because they're not wearing headscarves? Is that okay too? Can we not judge that action because we don't share the same experience?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 1910964, member: 13624"] [B]You. Don't. Get. It.[/B] You talk about holding people responsible, and then completely ignore the [I]fact[/I] that the people doing the rioting and killing are sentient actors. As GTG pointed out, cattle and dogs are not responsible for their actions because they're not sentient. Actually, he's only half-right: both can be trained. If you mean to suggest that the Muslim population, or some segment of it, is somewhere below the intellectual level of my walking steak dinner, then so state; as for myself, I believe that they're perfectly capable of choosing their actions. That makes them responsible for what they do, regardless of the provocation. Wow. Moral equivalency in its purest form. You really think murder is an acceptable response to words? How about shoving young girls into burning buildings because they're not wearing headscarves? Is that okay too? Can we not judge that action because we don't share the same experience? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Who Defends Our Right to Free Speech?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom