Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Who Defends Our Right to Free Speech?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave70968" data-source="post: 1911209" data-attributes="member: 13624"><p>So actions are only to be judged against community standards? Fine; let's play with that for a bit:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Slavery wasn't wrong; it was accepted by the the country/culture of the time</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Gassing six million Jews wasn't wrong; the country/culture accepted it as being within standards</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Flying a couple of jet airliners into buildings wasn't wrong; the culture doing it accepted it (celebrated, actually)</li> </ul><p>Besides the <em>obvious</em> absurdity of these positions, there are also some real, practical questions. How big of a community is required for something to become okay? Does it take a continent? A nation? A state, county, city block? What degree of homogeneity is required? Do 100% of the people in the bloc have to support the idea? 50% Just the leadership? What happens when two different cultures, with different standards, have to deal with each other? Whose standard rules?</p><p></p><p>I'd be interested in your answers to these questions, but frankly, if you can't agree that <em>murder is wrong</em>, I really don't see us finding any common ground.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave70968, post: 1911209, member: 13624"] So actions are only to be judged against community standards? Fine; let's play with that for a bit: [LIST] [*]Slavery wasn't wrong; it was accepted by the the country/culture of the time [*]Gassing six million Jews wasn't wrong; the country/culture accepted it as being within standards [*]Flying a couple of jet airliners into buildings wasn't wrong; the culture doing it accepted it (celebrated, actually) [/LIST] Besides the [I]obvious[/I] absurdity of these positions, there are also some real, practical questions. How big of a community is required for something to become okay? Does it take a continent? A nation? A state, county, city block? What degree of homogeneity is required? Do 100% of the people in the bloc have to support the idea? 50% Just the leadership? What happens when two different cultures, with different standards, have to deal with each other? Whose standard rules? I'd be interested in your answers to these questions, but frankly, if you can't agree that [I]murder is wrong[/I], I really don't see us finding any common ground. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Who Defends Our Right to Free Speech?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom