Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Who Defends Our Right to Free Speech?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dale00" data-source="post: 1911227" data-attributes="member: 688"><p>A person who does not believe in right and wrong will have a difficult time finding support from most people on this board. Someone else might pipe up that murder is not real and so our concern over our murdered diplomats is wrong. These sorts of discussions are best conducted on a philosophy board. I don't see their value here.</p><p></p><p>What does have merit, in my opinion, is the question of how we should react when people riot over a statement or a film or a cartoon. Some here have condemned the filmmaker and urge some sort of restraint of free speech to prevent violence. Others have argued that we should not restrict free speech because of the threat of violence. I do not see how we as a nation can tip toe around the sensitivities of others without damaging our free speech rights in the long run. Appeasement will lead to greater demands for restrictions on our freedoms.</p><p>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dale00, post: 1911227, member: 688"] A person who does not believe in right and wrong will have a difficult time finding support from most people on this board. Someone else might pipe up that murder is not real and so our concern over our murdered diplomats is wrong. These sorts of discussions are best conducted on a philosophy board. I don't see their value here. What does have merit, in my opinion, is the question of how we should react when people riot over a statement or a film or a cartoon. Some here have condemned the filmmaker and urge some sort of restraint of free speech to prevent violence. Others have argued that we should not restrict free speech because of the threat of violence. I do not see how we as a nation can tip toe around the sensitivities of others without damaging our free speech rights in the long run. Appeasement will lead to greater demands for restrictions on our freedoms. . [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Who Defends Our Right to Free Speech?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom