Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BIG_MIKE2005" data-source="post: 2043806" data-attributes="member: 3309">That is also cases with reasonable doubt, which isn't what I was talking about. I'm talking about events with multiple witness on scene, video evidence, confession, ect. Cases in which there is absolutely no question if the person committed that crime. Those are the people who we should weed outta the system with a quickness. Those are the cases that are cut & dry on who did the crime. I'm all for people who have a questionable cases getting to appeal it, but some of these people sit & admit to the crime then later try to appeal it on some BS reasons & it gets tied up in the system for years upon years.for instance the case from I believe over on the east coast where the 2 men went in I believe it was a doctors house & tried to beat him to death then raped his daughters/wife & killed them all while finishing it off by setting the house on fire. They caught those scumbags & they fully admitted to it in detail & evidence backed it up. there was no question they were guilty. those are the ones who should go straight from the verdict being read to the gallows. Why should we spend ignorant amounts of money to house & supposedly "rehabilitate" those individuals when the repeat offense rate is through the roof. Its apparent the whole "teach them a lesson" thing only works for a very small percentage of inmates, the rest only become better criminals while jailed & repeat or increase their crimes once released. Yet the majority of people who could vote to fix this tend to ignore it like its not happening.</blockquote>

Verification