Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Why aren't these in production?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NikatKimber" data-source="post: 1627635" data-attributes="member: 423"><p>This is my assumption. It would be like (or worse than) the Sig P225 and P239 that have nice slim grips, but then have a top heavy fat slide.</p><p></p><p>This is where the original S&W autos (not the M&P) have the advantage: they were originally single stack, with a thin slide; as the 39 and 52, then was made into the double stack 59.</p><p></p><p>Also, one of the biggest attractions to me for the Glock 9mm platform, is the mag and parts cross compatibility. I can use the 30rd G18 mag in the G26, and the extended slide stop and mag release from the G34/17L and such, on the 19 and 17 and so on.</p><p></p><p>By doing a "thin slide single stack" Glock 9mm, you lose a lot of that. Maybe not the trigger, but certainly holster, mag, and other small parts interchangeability.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NikatKimber, post: 1627635, member: 423"] This is my assumption. It would be like (or worse than) the Sig P225 and P239 that have nice slim grips, but then have a top heavy fat slide. This is where the original S&W autos (not the M&P) have the advantage: they were originally single stack, with a thin slide; as the 39 and 52, then was made into the double stack 59. Also, one of the biggest attractions to me for the Glock 9mm platform, is the mag and parts cross compatibility. I can use the 30rd G18 mag in the G26, and the extended slide stop and mag release from the G34/17L and such, on the 19 and 17 and so on. By doing a "thin slide single stack" Glock 9mm, you lose a lot of that. Maybe not the trigger, but certainly holster, mag, and other small parts interchangeability. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Why aren't these in production?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom