Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Why SG Ammo sucks
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WoodsCraft" data-source="post: 3912190" data-attributes="member: 51836"><p>Actually that's not exactly right. The state has to prove the retailer has nexus in the state in question before the seller is forced to collect a particular state's sales tax. </p><p></p><p>Nexus is established by a physical presence or because the seller routinely shipping to the state on a regular basis. Corrected after rereading the decision .. </p><p></p><p></p><p><em>The legislation provides a safe harbor for small sellers: a remote seller must make in-state sales exceeding $100,000 or makes 200 or more separate sales transactions in the previous or current calendar year for the nexus provision to apply. The legislation also ensures that the nexus provision does not apply retroactively.</em></p><p></p><p></p><p>I had a bad taste in my mouth over that Supreme Court Decision and though they wiped their butts with Constitution and opened the door for interstate taxation.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It also proves that going to a government court and getting a government judge to rule against the government is a hard almost impossible task. Especially where money is concerned </p><p></p><p></p><p>Sales taxes should be abolished in their entirety IMO</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WoodsCraft, post: 3912190, member: 51836"] Actually that's not exactly right. The state has to prove the retailer has nexus in the state in question before the seller is forced to collect a particular state's sales tax. Nexus is established by a physical presence or because the seller routinely shipping to the state on a regular basis. Corrected after rereading the decision .. [I]The legislation provides a safe harbor for small sellers: a remote seller must make in-state sales exceeding $100,000 or makes 200 or more separate sales transactions in the previous or current calendar year for the nexus provision to apply. The legislation also ensures that the nexus provision does not apply retroactively.[/I] I had a bad taste in my mouth over that Supreme Court Decision and though they wiped their butts with Constitution and opened the door for interstate taxation. It also proves that going to a government court and getting a government judge to rule against the government is a hard almost impossible task. Especially where money is concerned Sales taxes should be abolished in their entirety IMO [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Ammo & Reloading
Why SG Ammo sucks
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom