Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Why "stand your ground" is good law
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="abajaj11" data-source="post: 2248228" data-attributes="member: 3553"><p>The only "debate" on stand your ground is as follows: <em>Do you believe that a person who or whose loved ones are in<strong> imminent</strong> danger of death or grave bodily harm has a<strong> duty to retreat</strong>, or are they allowed to use lethal force <strong>immediatel</strong>y to alleviate this<strong> imminent</strong> danger?</em></p><p></p><p>Keep in mind, <strong>the danger is imminent</strong>, meaning you have <strong>seconds or less to react</strong>. What would you rather do if you felt you or your loved ones had only seconds or less to live or risk grave bodily harm? <strong>Look around for retreat avenues, or neutralize the threat?</strong></p><p></p><p>That's the only debate. <strong>The anti-2A folks clearly want you to not use lethal force. If you do, they will sue you.</strong> Of course, many of them have bodyguards and will not encounter a situation where they have seconds or less to decide.<strong> But if you believe in 2A and the empowerment of the common person, then where is the debate?</strong></p><p><img src="/images/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="abajaj11, post: 2248228, member: 3553"] The only "debate" on stand your ground is as follows: [I]Do you believe that a person who or whose loved ones are in[B] imminent[/B] danger of death or grave bodily harm has a[B] duty to retreat[/B], or are they allowed to use lethal force [B]immediatel[/B]y to alleviate this[B] imminent[/B] danger?[/I] Keep in mind, [B]the danger is imminent[/B], meaning you have [B]seconds or less to react[/B]. What would you rather do if you felt you or your loved ones had only seconds or less to live or risk grave bodily harm? [B]Look around for retreat avenues, or neutralize the threat?[/B] That's the only debate. [B]The anti-2A folks clearly want you to not use lethal force. If you do, they will sue you.[/B] Of course, many of them have bodyguards and will not encounter a situation where they have seconds or less to decide.[B] But if you believe in 2A and the empowerment of the common person, then where is the debate?[/B] :) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Why "stand your ground" is good law
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
