Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="VitruvianDoc" data-source="post: 1388577" data-attributes="member: 13736">I like how people look back at watergate and talk about how such a scandal that is and look at wikileaks and talk about how much of a terrorist he is.&nbsp; I don&#039;t agree with the harm brought towards soldiers due in part the iraq information released, but the harm wouldnt be there in the first place if we would leave (or maybe have not gone in the first place).I personally stand behind him.&nbsp; He is doing the job that a truly neutral and unbiassed news agency should do, but since all of Americas are in the pockets of some respective high up politician, they won&#039;t.Even with him arrested and if he should be prosecuted and imprisoned, there will still be the releasing of the documents.&nbsp; They are on the internet out in the wild, if he doesn&#039;t do it some one else will. Why? because it is of direct concern to the world audience, if not directly the US public.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="VitruvianDoc, post: 1388577, member: 13736"] I like how people look back at watergate and talk about how such a scandal that is and look at wikileaks and talk about how much of a terrorist he is. I don't agree with the harm brought towards soldiers due in part the iraq information released, but the harm wouldnt be there in the first place if we would leave (or maybe have not gone in the first place). I personally stand behind him. He is doing the job that a truly neutral and unbiassed news agency should do, but since all of Americas are in the pockets of some respective high up politician, they won't. Even with him arrested and if he should be prosecuted and imprisoned, there will still be the releasing of the documents. They are on the internet out in the wild, if he doesn't do it some one else will. Why? because it is of direct concern to the world audience, if not directly the US public. [/QUOTE]

Verification