Reply to Thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Okie4570" data-source="post: 3299838" data-attributes="member: 15643">Sure no problem. ODWC wants more deer taken, adding 7 days to the end of rifle will make a limited impact at best imo. I would still like to see the numbers of deer taken on the first week of rifle vs the second week of rifle. Texas folks have mentioned several times on FB that the reason their company doesn't have a corporate lease in OK is because of the "short" gun season........also been said that there are some on the wildlife commission with heavy interest in outfitters and leases. The added days may or may not include public hunting areas. As retrieverman stated above there's a couple other threads with expressed views.They are proposing as well to allow all six deer to be harvested with either a mzl or gun or combo of the two, that will result in way more deer taken imo, that is a valid idea/concept to take more deer. Adding more days for a longer lease or to book more hunters for an outfitter is only meeting the needs of those wanting to make more money. If they do both, odwc will be able to say "see, added gun days resulted in a greater harvest"...............it's like changing two variables in an experiment, it's hard to determine which variable made the impact on the final result.</blockquote>