Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
Will the Tulsa County Sheriff sign off on SBR?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buzzgun" data-source="post: 1558564" data-attributes="member: 4715"><p>Just to be clear, by signing a form 4, a LEO does not "authorize" anything. He/She is simply signing a statement that says he knows of no reason that the person requesting the transfer can't legally own the item. </p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, many LEOs seem to think they should control who has these items. </p><p></p><p>I have heard talk in the NFA community that the LEO signature requirement maybe going away.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buzzgun, post: 1558564, member: 4715"] Just to be clear, by signing a form 4, a LEO does not "authorize" anything. He/She is simply signing a statement that says he knows of no reason that the person requesting the transfer can't legally own the item. Unfortunately, many LEOs seem to think they should control who has these items. I have heard talk in the NFA community that the LEO signature requirement maybe going away. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
NFA & Class III Discussion
Will the Tulsa County Sheriff sign off on SBR?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom