Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Yahoo "News" Article on radical 2A Limit Proposals - with a glimmer of hope...
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mugsy" data-source="post: 2049762" data-attributes="member: 18914"><p>I completely agree - the logic of "Gun Free" Zones escapes me. How are they expected to actually produce safer schools? </p><p>If I were to, for example, accidentally walk my dog, while I am armed, past/through a "Gun Free" zone and an officer were to notice my gun then arrest me - who will have been made safer? The only real purpose seems to be able to pile on charges after the fact of some other crime being committed. </p><p></p><p>Now, I seem to recall that when I lived in Georgia there was a law on the books that said carrying a weapon anywhere with intent to commit a crime or harm to another was a crime in and of itself. I can at least understand the reasoning behind that law - even if I don't see how it can be ascertained in advance, in most cases, what someone "intends".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mugsy, post: 2049762, member: 18914"] I completely agree - the logic of "Gun Free" Zones escapes me. How are they expected to actually produce safer schools? If I were to, for example, accidentally walk my dog, while I am armed, past/through a "Gun Free" zone and an officer were to notice my gun then arrest me - who will have been made safer? The only real purpose seems to be able to pile on charges after the fact of some other crime being committed. Now, I seem to recall that when I lived in Georgia there was a law on the books that said carrying a weapon anywhere with intent to commit a crime or harm to another was a crime in and of itself. I can at least understand the reasoning behind that law - even if I don't see how it can be ascertained in advance, in most cases, what someone "intends". [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Yahoo "News" Article on radical 2A Limit Proposals - with a glimmer of hope...
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom