Nope.
Ob are you saying I am the accountant ? Lol. I understand what your saying and do agree. I am just saying it wouldn't hurt my feelings if we had no buck season for three years. I would go to some other state to hunt. What you said about mature bucks is very true once they get to be 5 1/2 they turn into a different buck. That being said all the 2 1/2 year old bucks now would be 5 1/2 in three years (There is that accountant degree coming in handy) those older class bucks would be harder to harvest so when it open up after three years I don't think they would wipe out the older bucks that easy. Jarded brought up a good point they would be a lot hunters that wouldn't hunt if they couldn't take a buck and without them taking a doe that would mess things up. And what I am saying doesn't make me right. I just think it would be interesting now the one buck limit I have been preacher this for years but hey not everbody is a trophy hunter and I must be a lousy one because I can't seem to kill one
If you want bucks to reach maturity get gunpowder out of the rut. No I wouldn't be in favor of it. I would like to see parts of the state go to a one buck harvest. But based on my observations at least in my area doe harvests should be increased. If you really want to increase maturity go to a draw system like iowa Kansas etc. move the antlerless only hunts up into October pre rut and move rifle season buck only to mid December. We don't have the statewide agriculture or genetics to grow monsters (state dosent mange for them either) I'm primarily a gun hunter so these changes would dramatically Impact me. Furthermore raise the non resident license fee.
Sent from NSA wire tapped device.
Enter your email address to join: