Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Yet more insanity, this time in sheriff Joe,s ao
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RickN" data-source="post: 2027370" data-attributes="member: 8854"><p>No their doctor should and as with everything else DOHbama, the UN and all other screwball groups should stay out of it. I forget where I say the stat, but the states without a law that lets them force those diagnosed as a threat to themselves or others into treatment have a 1/3 higher murder rate then states those with such a law. The idea behind doing away with such laws is to not violate the persons rights. Personally I think if a person is diagnosed as a threat then there should be a 2nd and third opinion and if 2 out of 3 agree the patient should be institutionalized until no longer a threat to others.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: I know this is from the hated Foxnews but it is worth reading.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/22/connecticut-killings-reopen-debate-on-mental-illness/" target="_blank">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/22/connecticut-killings-reopen-debate-on-mental-illness/</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RickN, post: 2027370, member: 8854"] No their doctor should and as with everything else DOHbama, the UN and all other screwball groups should stay out of it. I forget where I say the stat, but the states without a law that lets them force those diagnosed as a threat to themselves or others into treatment have a 1/3 higher murder rate then states those with such a law. The idea behind doing away with such laws is to not violate the persons rights. Personally I think if a person is diagnosed as a threat then there should be a 2nd and third opinion and if 2 out of 3 agree the patient should be institutionalized until no longer a threat to others. EDIT: I know this is from the hated Foxnews but it is worth reading. [url]http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/22/connecticut-killings-reopen-debate-on-mental-illness/[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Yet more insanity, this time in sheriff Joe,s ao
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom