Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="NikatKimber" data-source="post: 1350450" data-attributes="member: 423">Who let the trolls in?First, do you two have some sort of personal vendetta against Fox? I don&#039;t care personally, so don&#039;t point your red herring guns at me. You two are the first to bring up Fox in the this thread. So if you don&#039;t have some way of defending your favorite ethical news station (MSNBC), then shut up and go somewhere else. Fox has nothing to do with this thread.Second, I see no ethical reason for a political commentator to have a personal pick, and to donate to that campaign (they do get to vote still, don&#039;t they?). Unless, as in the case of MSNBC, there is a corporate rule saying they nor their employees will do that. So Fox having no such policy (going from what I&#039;ve read in the thread), is free to corporately or individually donate to whomever they choose; MSNBC has such a policy, so either they can all &quot;ethically&quot; NOT donate to anyone, or unethically donate. Which is the case at hand with this thread.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="NikatKimber, post: 1350450, member: 423"] Who let the trolls in? First, do you two have some sort of personal vendetta against Fox? I don't care personally, so don't point your red herring guns at me. You two are the first to bring up Fox in the this thread. So if you don't have some way of defending your favorite ethical news station (MSNBC), then shut up and go somewhere else. Fox has nothing to do with this thread. Second, I see no ethical reason for a political commentator to have a personal pick, and to donate to that campaign (they do get to vote still, don't they?). Unless, as in the case of MSNBC, there is a corporate rule saying they nor their employees will do that. So Fox having no such policy (going from what I've read in the thread), is free to corporately or individually donate to whomever they choose; MSNBC has such a policy, so either they can all "ethically" NOT donate to anyone, or [I]unethically[/I] donate. Which is the case at hand with this thread. [/QUOTE]

Verification