Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Zimmerman's lawyers drop him
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Robert871" data-source="post: 1769064" data-attributes="member: 10963"><p>I fail to see how that says something is not right with him. I certainly would not say that it is evidence against his case either. Unless you wish to dismiss the concept that there is any other reasons to stop talking to your lawyer and get a new one, other than because you are guilty.</p><p></p><p>"The announcement comes a day after Zimmerman's attorneys said that they were dropping the case because their client had stopped communicating with them. (On Sunday, Zimmerman launched a website seeking donations for his legal and living expenses.) According to Corey, Zimmerman had retained a new attorney "within the last hour.""</p><p></p><p>Sounds to me like hes got a new lawyer. </p><p></p><p>Fact is, none of us were there, none of us got to watch as whatever happened happen that night. you can say what you want, have your opinions and speak your gut, but the guilt or innocence of either persons involved in this matter are not you decision to place; thankfully we have a judicial system that at least will try to remove the bias and blatant one sided media focus from the verdict. </p><p></p><p>All i am seeing is that one man was shot by another, and the surviving one is claiming self defense, and the media is lighting the torches for a gigantic race fight claiming that the dead man is technically a minor, and the shooter was out for blood. And i have to note that all the pictures of the deceased i have seen on t.v. and in articles are at least 3-4 years old. couple that with how the words they choose to use are different depending on which side of the case they are talking about; i gotta say they have clearly taken a side.</p><p></p><p>And maybe i have taken a side. If the guy is guilty, then it is because he shot with the intention to kill, not the intention to stop an attacker and protect himself. at least the way i see it, it is as simple as that. You can argue until the cows come home, that the shooter was a vigilante or fancied him self a wanna be cop; you an even argue for the minors side too. but that is not what the focus should be on, the focus at the end of the day is WHY the trigger was pulled. nothing more matters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Robert871, post: 1769064, member: 10963"] I fail to see how that says something is not right with him. I certainly would not say that it is evidence against his case either. Unless you wish to dismiss the concept that there is any other reasons to stop talking to your lawyer and get a new one, other than because you are guilty. "The announcement comes a day after Zimmerman's attorneys said that they were dropping the case because their client had stopped communicating with them. (On Sunday, Zimmerman launched a website seeking donations for his legal and living expenses.) According to Corey, Zimmerman had retained a new attorney "within the last hour."" Sounds to me like hes got a new lawyer. Fact is, none of us were there, none of us got to watch as whatever happened happen that night. you can say what you want, have your opinions and speak your gut, but the guilt or innocence of either persons involved in this matter are not you decision to place; thankfully we have a judicial system that at least will try to remove the bias and blatant one sided media focus from the verdict. All i am seeing is that one man was shot by another, and the surviving one is claiming self defense, and the media is lighting the torches for a gigantic race fight claiming that the dead man is technically a minor, and the shooter was out for blood. And i have to note that all the pictures of the deceased i have seen on t.v. and in articles are at least 3-4 years old. couple that with how the words they choose to use are different depending on which side of the case they are talking about; i gotta say they have clearly taken a side. And maybe i have taken a side. If the guy is guilty, then it is because he shot with the intention to kill, not the intention to stop an attacker and protect himself. at least the way i see it, it is as simple as that. You can argue until the cows come home, that the shooter was a vigilante or fancied him self a wanna be cop; you an even argue for the minors side too. but that is not what the focus should be on, the focus at the end of the day is WHY the trigger was pulled. nothing more matters. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Zimmerman's lawyers drop him
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
