Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Zimmerman's lawyers drop him
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stephen Cue" data-source="post: 1770383" data-attributes="member: 3008"><p>Not justifying GZ's action but your statement implies he is guilty because he admits to killing Martin.</p><p></p><p>Affirmative defense, while conceding to certain claims by the plaintiff, does not mean guilty.</p><p></p><p>Of course what is guilt? Regarding this case it would mean guilty of unjustified use of deadly force.</p><p></p><p>While we all know he may be guilty of being an overzealous bonehead, guilty of excessive force, in the letter of Florida law, has not been proven clearly and overwhelmingly; and quite possibly may never be known.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think if GZ never got out of his car, which of course is bonehead mistake number one because he effectively left his occupied vehicle covered under 'Castle Doctrine', he would not be in this mess. </p><p></p><p>No property is worth taking a life, which by default Zimmerman killed Martin over, No matter who attacked whom first.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stephen Cue, post: 1770383, member: 3008"] Not justifying GZ's action but your statement implies he is guilty because he admits to killing Martin. Affirmative defense, while conceding to certain claims by the plaintiff, does not mean guilty. Of course what is guilt? Regarding this case it would mean guilty of unjustified use of deadly force. While we all know he may be guilty of being an overzealous bonehead, guilty of excessive force, in the letter of Florida law, has not been proven clearly and overwhelmingly; and quite possibly may never be known. I think if GZ never got out of his car, which of course is bonehead mistake number one because he effectively left his occupied vehicle covered under 'Castle Doctrine', he would not be in this mess. No property is worth taking a life, which by default Zimmerman killed Martin over, No matter who attacked whom first. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Zimmerman's lawyers drop him
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
