Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Zimmerman's lawyers drop him
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glocktogo" data-source="post: 1771905" data-attributes="member: 1132"><p>A 16 year old girl might say whatever would result in the incarceration of the person who killed her friend, true or not. I'm not suggesting this happened, merely leaving room open for that possibility. Since the things Martin told her weren't a dying declaration, anything she says he said is heresay and shouldn't be admissible in court. What she may have heard over the open line would be admissible and should carry the weight it deserves as a remote audible inference of events.</p><p></p><p>The affidavit does not mention the specifics of what the friend may have heard over the phone, just as it doesn't mention the alleged racial epithet or a great many details of the event. It will be interesting to see what actually comes out during the trial, which I hope will answer everyone's questions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glocktogo, post: 1771905, member: 1132"] A 16 year old girl might say whatever would result in the incarceration of the person who killed her friend, true or not. I'm not suggesting this happened, merely leaving room open for that possibility. Since the things Martin told her weren't a dying declaration, anything she says he said is heresay and shouldn't be admissible in court. What she may have heard over the open line would be admissible and should carry the weight it deserves as a remote audible inference of events. The affidavit does not mention the specifics of what the friend may have heard over the phone, just as it doesn't mention the alleged racial epithet or a great many details of the event. It will be interesting to see what actually comes out during the trial, which I hope will answer everyone's questions. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Zimmerman's lawyers drop him
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom