Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mhphoto" data-source="post: 947362" data-attributes="member: 6288">I wouldn&#039;t trust my life to one.If, for whatever reason, I absolutely had to carry something that small I&#039;d go with the .25 ACP in a heartbeat.I&#039;ve seen comparisons between those two with them coming in neck and neck, but I&#039;d venture to guess that the .22 data they were using for the comparison was from a rifle, not a small defensive pistol. Plus the .25 has centerfire reliability. But that&#039;s almost a moot point nowadays, with concealable 9mms like the Kahr PM9 and Kel-Tec PF-9 and P-11s. Heck, I think they even made a P-40 and P-357 for a short time. There&#039;s almost no excuse (short of absolutely not being able to handle the recoil of the bigger calibers in the smaller guns) to carry something that small with the great selection of CC pistols we have nowadays. Just my 2¢</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mhphoto, post: 947362, member: 6288"] I wouldn't trust my life to one. If, for whatever reason, I absolutely had to carry something that small I'd go with the .25 ACP in a heartbeat. I've seen comparisons between those two with them coming in neck and neck, but I'd venture to guess that the .22 data they were using for the comparison was from a rifle, not a small defensive pistol. Plus the .25 has centerfire reliability. But that's almost a moot point nowadays, with concealable 9mms like the Kahr PM9 and Kel-Tec PF-9 and P-11s. Heck, I think they even made a P-40 and P-357 for a short time. There's almost no excuse (short of absolutely not being able to handle the recoil of the bigger calibers in the smaller guns) to carry something that small with the great selection of CC pistols we have nowadays. Just my 2¢ [/QUOTE]

Verification