Jesus... Im not berating anyone. Not understanding where your getting that impression either. If you want numbers and crap then read up on DR Martin Fackler, COL Retired. A former Army and Navy trauma surgeon who was the first to study wound ballistics. HERES A HINT; His work is where the FBI originally got a lot of this data about bullet penetration
Go back and review post #21, I'm not sure how else your post could be received.
Glad you're up to speed on Fackler, was reading him 15+ years ago (and all the rebuttals.) But guess what he used to come to his initial conclusions? That's right.... 10% ballistic gel..... of which he developed. Of which you say is insufficient in predicting any results. He also speaks of my energy question, and subsequently other individuals address it also, but I think we are getting too deep there. Finally, one of the things you seemed to have scanned over is that the round I chose and posted test of, had superior penetration (not expansion because it's not a HP) for a .380. Of which, that round exceeds Fackler's initial minimum 12" requirement.
Point is, if you come and want tell everyone about ballistics, you might want to realize that others may have done their homework.