Advertisers exaggerate their products all the time; buying a certain brand of shampoo will bring you eternal happiness if you believe them.
A gun manufacturer advertising their version of a rifle as being more badass than other brands fall in this category IMHO.
At the same time, I don't think it would hurt gun manufacturers to tone down the macho stuff, and throw in some adds about using the AR for hunting and competition.
I certainly don't think this lawsuit should even be in court.
A gun manufacturer advertising their version of a rifle as being more badass than other brands fall in this category IMHO.
At the same time, I don't think it would hurt gun manufacturers to tone down the macho stuff, and throw in some adds about using the AR for hunting and competition.
I certainly don't think this lawsuit should even be in court.
Opens up a big can of worms.
Drunk driver kills your kid, sue chevy, and so on.
Drunk driver kills your kid, sue chevy, and so on.
I believe there have been other lawsuits against weapon manufacturers before
So could someone then sue McDonald's and other fast food places for making them Fat?
If a gun manufacturer is liable for the products they make and advertising they use then so is Any Other company that advertises anything they make and sell.
If a gun manufacturer is liable for the products they make and advertising they use then so is Any Other company that advertises anything they make and sell.
Rosie O'donnell should sue those that make forks for making her fat.
Can parents be sued for creating a dumb A$$ kid? Now there is a thought.
Similar threads
