Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
3-gun shotgun
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow" data-source="post: 1386975" data-attributes="member: 7123"><p>Also, EZ bake, your post is a blatent violation of forum rules, as a personal attack and name calling - would you care to voluntarily edit to to remove the violation? I asked you this same question very nicely by PM, but so far you have refused.</p><p></p><p>I said in my post "IN MY OPINION" -- twice. I am entitled to my opinion, but you are not entitled to make personal attacks and engage in name-calling, even if done via a link (since you're too chicken-#$%t to do it directly yourself).</p><p></p><p></p><p>And in fact, EZ Bake, in your PM response to mine, refusing to edit, you said this to me:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Which 3 would those be? Since there were only 4 posts before mine. Two of those 4 were asking QUESTIONS and didn't even make a statement - the OP and Firecop simply asked questions. ONE was olyeller (yes I disagreed with him - IMO as I said), and the 4th one recommended an FN SLP, the same gun that I mentioned/piled on with the same recommendation as him to the OP, as one of my recommendations within his budget. So since I only disagreed with one, where'd you get that I disagreed with three? Once again, par for the course, you have your facts all screwed up and backward - just like you did in another thread this week, where someone had to correct you because you didn't read the thread, and went off half-cocked with a nonsensical question. And this is far from being the first times that you've done this or similar. So you have a history of not reading threads before posting, getting your facts that you base your opinions on way way off, and now throwing insults and name-calling simply because I disagreed with someone, IN MY OPINION, as I said twice. Someone tell me, what are you allowed to even stay on this board?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nice post yes, but what the heck are you talking about "after-edit" - I did not edit that one at all. Yet again, you have your facts all mixed up. Go figure. Yes, thank gawd I can ignore your nonsense too.</p><p></p><p>In fact funny how you posted in response to me, after you assured me that you were going to ignore me - why don't you put your money where your big mouth is, and ignore me like you promised?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh, but ez bake, you're most certainly claiming to be an expert on the subject - otherwise you'd have not criticized my advice as so terribly wrong and stupid with the name-calling. So here we have someone who admits he's NEVER shot in a match, severely criticizing my opinion with name-calling - armchair quarterback anyone? And yes I have shot in 3-gun. I'm not an expert by any means, but I'm entitled to my opinion, and we've just established that I'm more experienced than you. So where do you get off with all the name-calling and wasting bandwidth for your noobish opinions?</p><p></p><p>The OP was on a budget - not everyone can afford the Benellis and such on a limited budget - hence the FN and Mossberg recommendations.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It IS for gamesmanship, to extend the tube mag. Why do you think that actual people who fight (police, etc.), choose 14"-18 inchers, or shorter? They're not playing games; they're actually fighting. Oh do tell - what exactly IS the reason for 24" if not to allow for an extended tube mag - I cannot wait to hear your 'wisdom' on this one. And a lot of Saiga guys are adding 5" to their 19" barrels to get to 24", right? You see that a lot don't ya? <img src="/images/smilies/rolleyes.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes (Sarcastic) :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></p><p></p><p>I actually post facts to defend my opinion, while you do nothing but drive-by name calling with no facts - sadly, that's just about all I expect from you now. My scope advice and bipod advice are and were as solid as they come, BTW. I know you disagree with Zak Smith (and me) on scopes, and you're entitled to your opinion - about right for someone who's not BTDT, as you say. I'm not gonna call you an idiot as you did to me. But go tell Zak how dumb he and others who agree with him are on practical rifle forums, and they will. Your small circle of acquaintances in OK ain't the end-all, be-all of expertise and opinions ya know. There's a world beyond your circle.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow, post: 1386975, member: 7123"] Also, EZ bake, your post is a blatent violation of forum rules, as a personal attack and name calling - would you care to voluntarily edit to to remove the violation? I asked you this same question very nicely by PM, but so far you have refused. I said in my post "IN MY OPINION" -- twice. I am entitled to my opinion, but you are not entitled to make personal attacks and engage in name-calling, even if done via a link (since you're too chicken-#$%t to do it directly yourself). And in fact, EZ Bake, in your PM response to mine, refusing to edit, you said this to me: Which 3 would those be? Since there were only 4 posts before mine. Two of those 4 were asking QUESTIONS and didn't even make a statement - the OP and Firecop simply asked questions. ONE was olyeller (yes I disagreed with him - IMO as I said), and the 4th one recommended an FN SLP, the same gun that I mentioned/piled on with the same recommendation as him to the OP, as one of my recommendations within his budget. So since I only disagreed with one, where'd you get that I disagreed with three? Once again, par for the course, you have your facts all screwed up and backward - just like you did in another thread this week, where someone had to correct you because you didn't read the thread, and went off half-cocked with a nonsensical question. And this is far from being the first times that you've done this or similar. So you have a history of not reading threads before posting, getting your facts that you base your opinions on way way off, and now throwing insults and name-calling simply because I disagreed with someone, IN MY OPINION, as I said twice. Someone tell me, what are you allowed to even stay on this board? Nice post yes, but what the heck are you talking about "after-edit" - I did not edit that one at all. Yet again, you have your facts all mixed up. Go figure. Yes, thank gawd I can ignore your nonsense too. In fact funny how you posted in response to me, after you assured me that you were going to ignore me - why don't you put your money where your big mouth is, and ignore me like you promised? Oh, but ez bake, you're most certainly claiming to be an expert on the subject - otherwise you'd have not criticized my advice as so terribly wrong and stupid with the name-calling. So here we have someone who admits he's NEVER shot in a match, severely criticizing my opinion with name-calling - armchair quarterback anyone? And yes I have shot in 3-gun. I'm not an expert by any means, but I'm entitled to my opinion, and we've just established that I'm more experienced than you. So where do you get off with all the name-calling and wasting bandwidth for your noobish opinions? The OP was on a budget - not everyone can afford the Benellis and such on a limited budget - hence the FN and Mossberg recommendations. It IS for gamesmanship, to extend the tube mag. Why do you think that actual people who fight (police, etc.), choose 14"-18 inchers, or shorter? They're not playing games; they're actually fighting. Oh do tell - what exactly IS the reason for 24" if not to allow for an extended tube mag - I cannot wait to hear your 'wisdom' on this one. And a lot of Saiga guys are adding 5" to their 19" barrels to get to 24", right? You see that a lot don't ya? :rolleyes: I actually post facts to defend my opinion, while you do nothing but drive-by name calling with no facts - sadly, that's just about all I expect from you now. My scope advice and bipod advice are and were as solid as they come, BTW. I know you disagree with Zak Smith (and me) on scopes, and you're entitled to your opinion - about right for someone who's not BTDT, as you say. I'm not gonna call you an idiot as you did to me. But go tell Zak how dumb he and others who agree with him are on practical rifle forums, and they will. Your small circle of acquaintances in OK ain't the end-all, be-all of expertise and opinions ya know. There's a world beyond your circle. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
3-gun shotgun
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom