Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
30-30 ammo
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="YukonGlocker" data-source="post: 2893231" data-attributes="member: 425"><p>The external ballistics of the 30-30 could also be represented with loads such as the Hornady 140gr. I've never seen anyone use 110gr. in 30-30 for anything practical. In any case, nobody believes the 30-30 has better (even if slightly) external ballistics than the 300 Blk does at *any* range. Additionally, if you're comparing energy carried past 100 yards, the 30-30 has a noticeable advantage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="YukonGlocker, post: 2893231, member: 425"] The external ballistics of the 30-30 could also be represented with loads such as the Hornady 140gr. I've never seen anyone use 110gr. in 30-30 for anything practical. In any case, nobody believes the 30-30 has better (even if slightly) external ballistics than the 300 Blk does at *any* range. Additionally, if you're comparing energy carried past 100 yards, the 30-30 has a noticeable advantage. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
30-30 ammo
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom