Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
.300 Blackout Questions.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ASP785" data-source="post: 1998351" data-attributes="member: 12170"><p>Excels may be a strong word...let's look at the available (limited) data to come up with a determination.</p><p></p><p>The 70 grn TSX loading will penetrate 20.55" of bare gel with 100% weight retention, 0" neck length and a recovered diameter of .432"</p><p>The 110 TTSX loading will penetrate 20.5" of bare gel. (Negligible difference), 0" neck length and a recovered diameter of .585" (.153 greater than the 70 grn, though not near enough to definitively declare a winner)</p><p></p><p>Their performance in this scenario is almost identical. The velocity difference is irrelevant. To prove whether or not it "excels" as you suggested, we would have to look at the temporary cavity length and diameter. This is data I do not have. So at this time, I cannot prove it excels at hunting compared to a 70 grn 5.56 loading. However, it certainly does not give anything up either and generally speaking, 30 caliber bullets will have a larger temporary cavity length and diameter.</p><p></p><p>The data listed above is not my own and was procured from <a href="http://www.ballesticstestingbbr.com" target="_blank">www.ballesticstestingbbr.com</a>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ASP785, post: 1998351, member: 12170"] Excels may be a strong word...let's look at the available (limited) data to come up with a determination. The 70 grn TSX loading will penetrate 20.55" of bare gel with 100% weight retention, 0" neck length and a recovered diameter of .432" The 110 TTSX loading will penetrate 20.5" of bare gel. (Negligible difference), 0" neck length and a recovered diameter of .585" (.153 greater than the 70 grn, though not near enough to definitively declare a winner) Their performance in this scenario is almost identical. The velocity difference is irrelevant. To prove whether or not it "excels" as you suggested, we would have to look at the temporary cavity length and diameter. This is data I do not have. So at this time, I cannot prove it excels at hunting compared to a 70 grn 5.56 loading. However, it certainly does not give anything up either and generally speaking, 30 caliber bullets will have a larger temporary cavity length and diameter. The data listed above is not my own and was procured from [url]www.ballesticstestingbbr.com[/url]. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
.300 Blackout Questions.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom