Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
ATF To Redefine ghost guns, Silencers, etc.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wawazat" data-source="post: 3573072" data-attributes="member: 35603"><p>I spend a meaningful amount of time every year reading and drafting comments on behalf of my company for new BLM (Bureau of Land Management, not the other one) regulations. Well thought out comments do get recognized as I follow through the commenting and proposal phases of this stuff. Looks like I will have something to occupy my downtime for the next few weeks.</p><p></p><p>If anyone is serious about submitting comments, I will share the approach I use. I typically read it in hard copy form and pencil in thoughts that come to mind as I read through it. Highlighting sections that trigger a thought of vagueness or conflicting with standing regulations also helps. From there I will research my notes and add depth to them in a Word document with plenty of references to support my suggested amendments. Once I have gone through it a couple of times, I will then start a second Word document to organize my thoughts and review my choice of words to start getting the initial draft of my response. Once that is done, I try to let it sit and not think about it for a few days then proofread one more time and make notes and adjustments to prep the final draft for submission.</p><p></p><p>It is a TON of work, but luckily this one doesnt require the legwork of forecasting cost to the company and new floors for production before shutting in a well due to additional regulatory expenses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wawazat, post: 3573072, member: 35603"] I spend a meaningful amount of time every year reading and drafting comments on behalf of my company for new BLM (Bureau of Land Management, not the other one) regulations. Well thought out comments do get recognized as I follow through the commenting and proposal phases of this stuff. Looks like I will have something to occupy my downtime for the next few weeks. If anyone is serious about submitting comments, I will share the approach I use. I typically read it in hard copy form and pencil in thoughts that come to mind as I read through it. Highlighting sections that trigger a thought of vagueness or conflicting with standing regulations also helps. From there I will research my notes and add depth to them in a Word document with plenty of references to support my suggested amendments. Once I have gone through it a couple of times, I will then start a second Word document to organize my thoughts and review my choice of words to start getting the initial draft of my response. Once that is done, I try to let it sit and not think about it for a few days then proofread one more time and make notes and adjustments to prep the final draft for submission. It is a TON of work, but luckily this one doesnt require the legwork of forecasting cost to the company and new floors for production before shutting in a well due to additional regulatory expenses. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
ATF To Redefine ghost guns, Silencers, etc.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom