Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Ban people on terrorism watch list or no-fly list from owning firearms?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mugsy" data-source="post: 2821732" data-attributes="member: 18914"><p>abajaj11 - this same point has come up in several other threads. The anti-2A folks seem all too willing to strip citizens of a Constitutionally guaranteed right via a shadowy process with no notification requirements and no due process protections. As one article pointed out - the criteria that should be used are fairly clear but who may make the determination, upon what evidence, and how the accused can refute any such determination are problematic. I also have to ask myself, if a person is so dangerous as to merit being kept from flying then why is that person not too dangerous to drive to where he wishes to go? Or why is he not being arrested?</p><p></p><p>A surveillance list, based upon evidence and with judicial warrant for any necessary taps/searches, is KN to me, as is a "no fly" list that keeps out non-US citizens based upon suspected illegal activity. However, US citizens and legal residents not only deserve, but have guaranteed, legal protections that cannot simply be ignored.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mugsy, post: 2821732, member: 18914"] abajaj11 - this same point has come up in several other threads. The anti-2A folks seem all too willing to strip citizens of a Constitutionally guaranteed right via a shadowy process with no notification requirements and no due process protections. As one article pointed out - the criteria that should be used are fairly clear but who may make the determination, upon what evidence, and how the accused can refute any such determination are problematic. I also have to ask myself, if a person is so dangerous as to merit being kept from flying then why is that person not too dangerous to drive to where he wishes to go? Or why is he not being arrested? A surveillance list, based upon evidence and with judicial warrant for any necessary taps/searches, is KN to me, as is a "no fly" list that keeps out non-US citizens based upon suspected illegal activity. However, US citizens and legal residents not only deserve, but have guaranteed, legal protections that cannot simply be ignored. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Ban people on terrorism watch list or no-fly list from owning firearms?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom