Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Beretta M9/92F: OSA's Opinion
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JD8" data-source="post: 1615219" data-attributes="member: 24"><p>Absolutely. The more I become exposed to trauma and those that work in trauma, I see how tough the human body can be first hand the more I become biased. This is not to say that 9mm is inadequate, it's to say that once you start playing with the variables in the simple equation I stated earlier, you're gonna get more damage, especially on tougher tissues, of which the human body is loaded with. </p><p></p><p>Now I choose platform first then caliber. The 1911, Glock, or Kahr is what I have best luck shooting in quick succession. The more training I exposed myself to the more I became comfortable shooting more powerful calibers in quick succession. YMMV. Will a 9mm always be slightly quicker? Sure, but that's where I differ in priority. Capacity? I'll take my chances with 8+1 and an extra mag. </p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>and that's EXACTLY why I called BS on weight not being significant. <img src="/images/smilies/biggrin.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" data-shortname=":D" /> The 20 year old article still has some merit but shouldn't be taken as gospel, just like any study done so far, as nobody can reproduce the human body in a complete manner.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JD8, post: 1615219, member: 24"] Absolutely. The more I become exposed to trauma and those that work in trauma, I see how tough the human body can be first hand the more I become biased. This is not to say that 9mm is inadequate, it's to say that once you start playing with the variables in the simple equation I stated earlier, you're gonna get more damage, especially on tougher tissues, of which the human body is loaded with. Now I choose platform first then caliber. The 1911, Glock, or Kahr is what I have best luck shooting in quick succession. The more training I exposed myself to the more I became comfortable shooting more powerful calibers in quick succession. YMMV. Will a 9mm always be slightly quicker? Sure, but that's where I differ in priority. Capacity? I'll take my chances with 8+1 and an extra mag. and that's EXACTLY why I called BS on weight not being significant. :D The 20 year old article still has some merit but shouldn't be taken as gospel, just like any study done so far, as nobody can reproduce the human body in a complete manner. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Beretta M9/92F: OSA's Opinion
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom