Beretta Nano (New Beretta Subcompact)

[alank2]

Hi,

I think it follows the styling of the px4 without being too much. I would like to see how it stacks up against a PM9. I sure hope it has a slide stop...

Thanks,

Alan

 

[ripnbst]

If that pin in the frame that is exposed is where the trigger pivots that's gonna be one long azz trigger pull.

Also, looks like no external safety. Will this be the first Beretta without an external safety?

 

[davek]

The Beretta PX4 Type C "Constant Action" doesn't have an external safety.
The PX4 subcompacts don't use the rotating barrel.
The sights on the Nano are adjustable with a 1.5mm hex wrench, a nice touch. It's interesting that it doesn't have an external slide lock, that's something new. That'll make it really skinny.
I did have a Type C PX4 for a while along with a Walther PPS. Maybe they did get together when I wasn't around.
If the Nano is as well made as the PX4 I think this might be a really nice little pistol.

 

[AKguy1985]

that is kinda ugly and kinda looks like a storm to me

 

[Euclid]

The Beretta PX4 Type C "Constant Action" doesn't have an external safety.
The PX4 subcompacts don't use the rotating barrel.
The sights on the Nano are adjustable with a 1.5mm hex wrench, a nice touch. It's interesting that it doesn't have an external slide lock, that's something new. That'll make it really skinny.
I did have a Type C PX4 for a while along with a Walther PPS. Maybe they did get together when I wasn't around.
If the Nano is as well made as the PX4 I think this might be a really nice little pistol.

My bad on the rotating barrel assumption, BUT if it does not use that type of lock-up then I have to question a design crafted for CC with such a high sight radius.

I'll be really interested to see the dimensions and how they compare to, say, a PF-9 or PM-9...

 

[ez bake]

BUT if it does not use that type of lock-up then I have to question a design crafted for CC with such a high sight radius.

Yeah, but to be honest, a lot of folks bash guns with a high bore-axis (I assume that's what you mean instead of sight-radius), and while its true that is some guns, it makes a very un-natural point/sight, its not always the case. I find that my Sigs make for an easy and accurate point-n-shoot and they're nowhere near a Glock's bore-axis (I find that I'm not noticeably quicker on target with a Glock over a Sig - all things being equal). I'm getting used to my XD9sc, but its still not a deal-breaker (and it looks like a double-decker bus).

Still, there's no denying that the Beretta Nano "ain't got no alibi"

 

[n423]

I'll pass on it....

 

[alank2]

Hi,

No slide stop/slide lock is the deal killer for me.

Thanks,

Alan

 

[Sanjuro82]

This is the carry piece that I'm waiting on. It's supposed to FINALLY be out next month (fingers crossed). It's the Bersa BP9CC.

[Broken External Image]

 

[redmax51]

I've got no interest in it but who cares what it looks like?? It's a defensive firearm not a shirt. If it shoots well,is reliable and fits your hand it might be for you.