Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Bringing firearm to work consequences
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dennishoddy" data-source="post: 3789962" data-attributes="member: 5412"><p>My last employer encouraged a guy in the machine shop that was building .22 rifles for his grand kids.</p><p>Master machinist that mimicked the Olympic styled rifles that had adjustable everything. The only thing he didn't build was the rifling within the barrels although he had machined the rifling in past builds. His concept of a progressive rifling didn't produce as he wanted, so he went back to barrel blanks like every other custom gun manufacturer builds. No issues of guns being on the property. Company policy said no, but it was widely ignored. I made a comment in one of our weekly safety meetings that I'd be more than happy to lead a Power Plant security reaction group if they would fund the training fees and ammo. Team supplying the weapons. Nobody knows the nooks and crannies of a power plant other than the employees that were there daily. </p><p>The contracted "security guy" in his tactical clothing totally rejected my suggestions saying the 6' barbed wire fence around 5000 acres was sufficient with an additional 8' fence around the immediate perimeter of the power plant would provide security. ( he was an employee of the fence company)</p><p>When I commented with a lot of scarcasm in my voice that that was nothing more than a 4 year old could defeat, I was asked to leave the meeting. Sounds like a biden crime family deal?</p><p>Why would someone be asked to leave a meeting when they were telling the truth?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dennishoddy, post: 3789962, member: 5412"] My last employer encouraged a guy in the machine shop that was building .22 rifles for his grand kids. Master machinist that mimicked the Olympic styled rifles that had adjustable everything. The only thing he didn't build was the rifling within the barrels although he had machined the rifling in past builds. His concept of a progressive rifling didn't produce as he wanted, so he went back to barrel blanks like every other custom gun manufacturer builds. No issues of guns being on the property. Company policy said no, but it was widely ignored. I made a comment in one of our weekly safety meetings that I'd be more than happy to lead a Power Plant security reaction group if they would fund the training fees and ammo. Team supplying the weapons. Nobody knows the nooks and crannies of a power plant other than the employees that were there daily. The contracted "security guy" in his tactical clothing totally rejected my suggestions saying the 6' barbed wire fence around 5000 acres was sufficient with an additional 8' fence around the immediate perimeter of the power plant would provide security. ( he was an employee of the fence company) When I commented with a lot of scarcasm in my voice that that was nothing more than a 4 year old could defeat, I was asked to leave the meeting. Sounds like a biden crime family deal? Why would someone be asked to leave a meeting when they were telling the truth? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Bringing firearm to work consequences
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom
