Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Can a VPO require disarmament?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HMFIC" data-source="post: 1890435" data-attributes="member: 7539"><p>Yup... that's the way it works when they file an emergency VPO. It's an ex parte hearing where they stand before the judge and offer some explanation of why they feel they need it. If there was a relationship of some kind, it's just about automatic. Either way though, the standard is very low at that hearing and gives the person requesting it much benefit of the doubt (as should probably be). At this stage of the game, it's only a temporary order.</p><p></p><p>When the REAL hearing is scheduled, then the other party gets to show up and challenge everything to keep it from becoming a permanent order. Here is where the rubber hits the road and I don't have any insight as to how easy it is for the person who took it out to gain a permanent order without some serious evidence. I would hope that judges weigh it very carefully.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HMFIC, post: 1890435, member: 7539"] Yup... that's the way it works when they file an emergency VPO. It's an ex parte hearing where they stand before the judge and offer some explanation of why they feel they need it. If there was a relationship of some kind, it's just about automatic. Either way though, the standard is very low at that hearing and gives the person requesting it much benefit of the doubt (as should probably be). At this stage of the game, it's only a temporary order. When the REAL hearing is scheduled, then the other party gets to show up and challenge everything to keep it from becoming a permanent order. Here is where the rubber hits the road and I don't have any insight as to how easy it is for the person who took it out to gain a permanent order without some serious evidence. I would hope that judges weigh it very carefully. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Can a VPO require disarmament?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom