Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Can a VPO require disarmament?
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mons meg" data-source="post: 1892418" data-attributes="member: 90"><p>Ah yes, the story gets better. SIB and I both know this person from school, etc. He texted me to tell me that the local PD is holding onto his guns for SIX MONTHS per their policy, even though the temporary VPO was dismissed. Said he was told it was a "cooling off" measure. His story checks out on OSCN .</p><p></p><p>I encouraged him to ask his current attorney (family law specialist) what she might be able to do, and possibly to get a consult from a local specialist like Doug Friesen if they can't get the judge to send over an order to the City Attorney. Policy is NOT the law.</p><p></p><p>Now, for all of you still following this: WTF....... how can the local PD go above and beyond the judge's order and hold personal property like this? 6 months is long enough to be REALLY annoying, but short enouh that I bet most lawsuits will take longer to process than simply waiting them out. He can go legally buy NEW guns, he just can't have his other ones back? Does he not have a pretty good case here on a 4th or 5th Amendment complaint?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mons meg, post: 1892418, member: 90"] Ah yes, the story gets better. SIB and I both know this person from school, etc. He texted me to tell me that the local PD is holding onto his guns for SIX MONTHS per their policy, even though the temporary VPO was dismissed. Said he was told it was a "cooling off" measure. His story checks out on OSCN . I encouraged him to ask his current attorney (family law specialist) what she might be able to do, and possibly to get a consult from a local specialist like Doug Friesen if they can't get the judge to send over an order to the City Attorney. Policy is NOT the law. Now, for all of you still following this: WTF....... how can the local PD go above and beyond the judge's order and hold personal property like this? 6 months is long enough to be REALLY annoying, but short enouh that I bet most lawsuits will take longer to process than simply waiting them out. He can go legally buy NEW guns, he just can't have his other ones back? Does he not have a pretty good case here on a 4th or 5th Amendment complaint? [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Can a VPO require disarmament?
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom