Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Cherokee hunting, fishing rights compact negotiations expected
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fishfurlife" data-source="post: 2752846" data-attributes="member: 15170"><p>In a world that everyone wants to be equal these days, this sure contradicts that mantra. </p><p></p><p>I don't/Won't ever agree with the decision that was made. Let them hunt on their own lands for free. But don't let somebody that is supposed to be "equal" to me stand next to me and fish/hunt free of charge. Call me what you want, it's bogus. </p><p></p><p>If that $300k is being used to buy that many fish/hunting licenses along with a component wry deer tag and turkey tag, then the state is loosing out in the end. Period. No matter if P-R money is being added in or not. </p><p></p><p>Do the math Dennis. Your own given equation blows everything you are trying to say out of the water. Ten percent of 150,000 is 15,000. Multiply that by $25 for only a hunting or fishing license and you get $375,000. So please, tell me how the state is making out good here? Factor in a deer tag for each of the licenses and that number shoots up to $675,000 for the 15,000 tags you assumed might be bought. Do the math on that ten percent with combo tags and all the sudden it becomes clear that the sportsman are not benefiting from this hardly at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fishfurlife, post: 2752846, member: 15170"] In a world that everyone wants to be equal these days, this sure contradicts that mantra. I don't/Won't ever agree with the decision that was made. Let them hunt on their own lands for free. But don't let somebody that is supposed to be "equal" to me stand next to me and fish/hunt free of charge. Call me what you want, it's bogus. If that $300k is being used to buy that many fish/hunting licenses along with a component wry deer tag and turkey tag, then the state is loosing out in the end. Period. No matter if P-R money is being added in or not. Do the math Dennis. Your own given equation blows everything you are trying to say out of the water. Ten percent of 150,000 is 15,000. Multiply that by $25 for only a hunting or fishing license and you get $375,000. So please, tell me how the state is making out good here? Factor in a deer tag for each of the licenses and that number shoots up to $675,000 for the 15,000 tags you assumed might be bought. Do the math on that ten percent with combo tags and all the sudden it becomes clear that the sportsman are not benefiting from this hardly at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Hobbies & Interests
Hunting & Fishing
Cherokee hunting, fishing rights compact negotiations expected
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom