Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
"Concealed Carry Customer Kills Robber"
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sam Shoun" data-source="post: 1877076" data-attributes="member: 15489"><p>Would it not be permitted under this section of the law?</p><p></p><p>21; 1289.25; D</p><p><em>"A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself <strong>or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.</strong>"</em></p><p></p><p>I always thought that was awkwardly stated, because it says a person "who is attacked...". But reading it that way would also preclude an individual's right to defend his family if he weren't directly attacked himself.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, regardless of the legality, I would urge anyone considering appropriate tactics for such a scenario to consider this experience:</p><p><a href="http://www.policeone.com/columnists/lom/articles/134804-Blood-lessons/" target="_blank">http://www.policeone.com/columnists/lom/articles/134804-Blood-lessons/</a></p><p></p><p>It seems like the CCW'er in the original post played it well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sam Shoun, post: 1877076, member: 15489"] Would it not be permitted under this section of the law? 21; 1289.25; D [I]"A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself [B]or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.[/B]"[/I] I always thought that was awkwardly stated, because it says a person "who is attacked...". But reading it that way would also preclude an individual's right to defend his family if he weren't directly attacked himself. Anyway, regardless of the legality, I would urge anyone considering appropriate tactics for such a scenario to consider this experience: [url]http://www.policeone.com/columnists/lom/articles/134804-Blood-lessons/[/url] It seems like the CCW'er in the original post played it well. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
Competition, Tactics & Training
Self Defense & Handgun Carry
"Concealed Carry Customer Kills Robber"
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom