Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Constutional carry law
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jakeman" data-source="post: 3286649" data-attributes="member: 10690"><p>1289.13A seems to contradict 1289.7 and 1289.13.</p><p></p><p>1289.7 & 1289.13 are incredibly clear in their intent and meaning.</p><p></p><p>1289.13A seems to directly contradict both of them.</p><p></p><p>Can one of you legal scholars please explain?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>edited - for clarity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jakeman, post: 3286649, member: 10690"] 1289.13A seems to contradict 1289.7 and 1289.13. 1289.7 & 1289.13 are incredibly clear in their intent and meaning. 1289.13A seems to directly contradict both of them. Can one of you legal scholars please explain? edited - for clarity. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Constutional carry law
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom