Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Constutional carry law
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rollpin" data-source="post: 3287641" data-attributes="member: 44873"><p>No. Because <em>what other category of person is there? </em></p><p><em></em></p><p>The only category is one prohibited from possessing.</p><p>Am I to believe that one prohibited from possessing faces the equivalent of a $70 meter maid ticket?</p><p>No, they fall under the legal category of one prohibited from possessing.</p><p></p><p>so the question remains: Who the heck is this $70 citation aimed at? By the letter of the law, someone who didn’t pay for an SDA card and a Fudd instructor to pencil whip that they burned through hearing bad legal advice and whatever the rounds requirement is for buying ones rights, aka an SDA card.</p><p></p><p>ETA: to clarify, it seems to me that the law is merely stating one can legally transport concealed. The rub is that if they are pulled over for a traffic violation they can be hit with an extra ticket for improper transportation of a firearm.</p><p></p><p>That is the sort of jackassery I certainly expect from RINOs pandering to their base. But it’s definitely not Constitutional as the Founding Fathers intended. Then again, America as we know it isn’t Constitutional at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rollpin, post: 3287641, member: 44873"] No. Because [I]what other category of person is there? [/I] The only category is one prohibited from possessing. Am I to believe that one prohibited from possessing faces the equivalent of a $70 meter maid ticket? No, they fall under the legal category of one prohibited from possessing. so the question remains: Who the heck is this $70 citation aimed at? By the letter of the law, someone who didn’t pay for an SDA card and a Fudd instructor to pencil whip that they burned through hearing bad legal advice and whatever the rounds requirement is for buying ones rights, aka an SDA card. ETA: to clarify, it seems to me that the law is merely stating one can legally transport concealed. The rub is that if they are pulled over for a traffic violation they can be hit with an extra ticket for improper transportation of a firearm. That is the sort of jackassery I certainly expect from RINOs pandering to their base. But it’s definitely not Constitutional as the Founding Fathers intended. Then again, America as we know it isn’t Constitutional at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Constutional carry law
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom