Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Daunte Wright Shooting
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JD8" data-source="post: 3560758" data-attributes="member: 24"><p>Sentence fragments......not not not making total sense. </p><p></p><p>I don't have a side here. The policy was agreed upon between the two entities. The officer and his supervisor shouldn't have tried to unlawfully compromise this policy. Seems the courts and the their higher ups agreed. </p><p></p><p>Speaking of research, one should question why they were so insistent on getting the blood? The poor bastard was a victim of a nasty auto collision where the State police were chasing an individual that crashed into the victim. Again, why so insistent on the blood? Trying to displace blame much?</p><p></p><p>I'm all for backing the blue within reason, but this whole scenario was complete BS from the start. </p><p></p><p>A neat article on "implied consent" the officer was basing his lawsuit on...... doesn't look good.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.overdriveonline.com/business/article/14893011/excuse-me-sir-do-you-have-any-implied-consent" target="_blank">https://www.overdriveonline.com/business/article/14893011/excuse-me-sir-do-you-have-any-implied-consent</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JD8, post: 3560758, member: 24"] Sentence fragments......not not not making total sense. I don't have a side here. The policy was agreed upon between the two entities. The officer and his supervisor shouldn't have tried to unlawfully compromise this policy. Seems the courts and the their higher ups agreed. Speaking of research, one should question why they were so insistent on getting the blood? The poor bastard was a victim of a nasty auto collision where the State police were chasing an individual that crashed into the victim. Again, why so insistent on the blood? Trying to displace blame much? I'm all for backing the blue within reason, but this whole scenario was complete BS from the start. A neat article on "implied consent" the officer was basing his lawsuit on...... doesn't look good. [URL]https://www.overdriveonline.com/business/article/14893011/excuse-me-sir-do-you-have-any-implied-consent[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
Daunte Wright Shooting
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom