Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
Photo Album
Decided to build a .300 AAC Blackout
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Koshinn" data-source="post: 1600778" data-attributes="member: 18314"><p>Not targetted towards you, but I really don't like the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" attitude. Innovation rarely takes giant leaps, it's often incremental. That being said, the 300AAC is an interesting round because it can use STANAG mags and regular AR lower receivers.</p><p></p><p>Let's look at, say, a 9mm sub machine gun or AR and compare it to a 5.56 AR.</p><p>Firing supersonic without regards to noise, the 5.56mm round will outperform 9mm in terminal ballistics and range, although will most likely lose in penetration (depending on loads). Firing subsonic where their velocities are equal, the 9mm round will win in every way. The 300AAC round is somewhere in the middle of everything. It can outperform 5.56 subsonic and outperform 9mm supersonic. The advantage is that all it requires is changing magazines (or alternating your bullets I guess, but that's kind of strange). Interestingly (or perhaps not), a supersonic 300AAC round is very similar to a 7.62x39 round (300AAC: 125gr OTM @ 2250ft/s vs 7.62x39: 123gr FMJ @ 2400ft/s). From the "stopping power" perspective the 300AAC round could completely replace 5.56mm. From ballistics at longer ranges, I have no idea, but that's possible too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Koshinn, post: 1600778, member: 18314"] Not targetted towards you, but I really don't like the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" attitude. Innovation rarely takes giant leaps, it's often incremental. That being said, the 300AAC is an interesting round because it can use STANAG mags and regular AR lower receivers. Let's look at, say, a 9mm sub machine gun or AR and compare it to a 5.56 AR. Firing supersonic without regards to noise, the 5.56mm round will outperform 9mm in terminal ballistics and range, although will most likely lose in penetration (depending on loads). Firing subsonic where their velocities are equal, the 9mm round will win in every way. The 300AAC round is somewhere in the middle of everything. It can outperform 5.56 subsonic and outperform 9mm supersonic. The advantage is that all it requires is changing magazines (or alternating your bullets I guess, but that's kind of strange). Interestingly (or perhaps not), a supersonic 300AAC round is very similar to a 7.62x39 round (300AAC: 125gr OTM @ 2250ft/s vs 7.62x39: 123gr FMJ @ 2400ft/s). From the "stopping power" perspective the 300AAC round could completely replace 5.56mm. From ballistics at longer ranges, I have no idea, but that's possible too. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
Photo Album
Decided to build a .300 AAC Blackout
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom