Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
DEQ cautions the public about eating fish from Oklahoma lakes
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="YukonGlocker" data-source="post: 3006259" data-attributes="member: 425"><p>I spent some time since this thread was posted researching this issue because it's important to me as a life-long fisherman. If we're going to do anything about harmful levels of mercury in fish, we have to know where its coming from. There is a great deal of agreement in the scientific studies on this issue that some of the mercury is naturally coming from the earth's crust and released into the atmosphere during events like volcanos (in both cases, the mercury ends up in the water). There is also a great deal of agreement in the scientific studies on the issue that this naturally produced mercury accounts for less than one-third of the mercury ending up in fish, and by itself would not be harmful in the vast majorities of waters; an example exception might be a temporary increase in a lake where massive amounts of volcano lava ran into, although that would dissipate over time to normal levels; in the ocean, it dissipates quickly enough to have no meaningful effect. The remaining (and majority) of mercury in fish indeed comes from man-produced sources such as coal burning, gold mining, and chloralkali manufacturing...both in runoff from the handling of the products involved, and in their release to the atmosphere (both end up in the water, then in the fish).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="YukonGlocker, post: 3006259, member: 425"] I spent some time since this thread was posted researching this issue because it's important to me as a life-long fisherman. If we're going to do anything about harmful levels of mercury in fish, we have to know where its coming from. There is a great deal of agreement in the scientific studies on this issue that some of the mercury is naturally coming from the earth's crust and released into the atmosphere during events like volcanos (in both cases, the mercury ends up in the water). There is also a great deal of agreement in the scientific studies on the issue that this naturally produced mercury accounts for less than one-third of the mercury ending up in fish, and by itself would not be harmful in the vast majorities of waters; an example exception might be a temporary increase in a lake where massive amounts of volcano lava ran into, although that would dissipate over time to normal levels; in the ocean, it dissipates quickly enough to have no meaningful effect. The remaining (and majority) of mercury in fish indeed comes from man-produced sources such as coal burning, gold mining, and chloralkali manufacturing...both in runoff from the handling of the products involved, and in their release to the atmosphere (both end up in the water, then in the fish). [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Water Cooler
General Discussion
DEQ cautions the public about eating fish from Oklahoma lakes
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom