Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Diamondback DB9 PIcs and Initial Impressions.
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sanjuro82" data-source="post: 1640088" data-attributes="member: 14058"><p>Not a bad idea. I think for the most part the DB design is a very good one. And once they work out all the minor kinks, it will be just about unbeatable in the ultra compact 9 category. Buying a Gen1 gun wasn't really a concern to me as I pretty much tweak/fine tune all of my guns. Getting the gun to where it is now (running reliably) is part the fun for me.</p><p></p><p>I'm definitely not seeing as many problems showing up in all the forums, so that tells me that a lot of the bugs are getting squashed. Keep in mind that a LARGE majority of FTFs and FTEs are a result of limp wristing. Most folks just don't know how to hold these short barreled pocket guns properly. </p><p></p><p>I also saw a post recently of a DB9 that showed a picture of a ruptured barrel. The guy claimed the failure was a result of using +P ammo in the DB9. But based off the picture it was pretty clear the failure was a result of a bore obstruction (maybe even a deliberate obstruction). I think the guy was trying to troll, maybe he's a Kel-Tec employee or something. <img src="/images/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sanjuro82, post: 1640088, member: 14058"] Not a bad idea. I think for the most part the DB design is a very good one. And once they work out all the minor kinks, it will be just about unbeatable in the ultra compact 9 category. Buying a Gen1 gun wasn't really a concern to me as I pretty much tweak/fine tune all of my guns. Getting the gun to where it is now (running reliably) is part the fun for me. I'm definitely not seeing as many problems showing up in all the forums, so that tells me that a lot of the bugs are getting squashed. Keep in mind that a LARGE majority of FTFs and FTEs are a result of limp wristing. Most folks just don't know how to hold these short barreled pocket guns properly. I also saw a post recently of a DB9 that showed a picture of a ruptured barrel. The guy claimed the failure was a result of using +P ammo in the DB9. But based off the picture it was pretty clear the failure was a result of a bore obstruction (maybe even a deliberate obstruction). I think the guy was trying to troll, maybe he's a Kel-Tec employee or something. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Handgun Discussion
Diamondback DB9 PIcs and Initial Impressions.
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom