Reply to Thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SMS" data-source="post: 1620841" data-attributes="member: 42">I&#039;d agree...provided they just cut the whole program and stopped taking money from one class to give it to another.&nbsp; But since they won&#039;t ever stop doing that, I want my &quot;investment&quot; protected (tongue in cheek)....even if it means adding to the bureaucracy.Look at it as another job creation initiative.&nbsp; My wife is partially in the drug testing business....she said she could do it for as cheap as $7 a pop if she had such a large pool of customers.&nbsp; Another woman she works with has infrastrucure in multiple Oklahoma counties...she could rapidly expand her private business, hire more people and execute the testing for such a program almost instantly.&nbsp; The only additional burden on the State would be adding a sheet of paper to the recipient&#039;s case file.More jobs, and less taxpayer money spent....instead of our usual formula of throwing away money in the name of job creation.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SMS, post: 1620841, member: 42"] I'd agree...provided they just cut the whole program and stopped taking money from one class to give it to another. But since they won't [I]ever[/I] stop doing that, I want my "investment" protected (tongue in cheek)....even if it means adding to the bureaucracy. Look at it as another job creation initiative. My wife is partially in the drug testing business....she said she could do it for as cheap as $7 a pop if she had such a large pool of customers. Another woman she works with has infrastrucure in multiple Oklahoma counties...she could rapidly expand her private business, hire more people and execute the testing for such a program almost instantly. The only additional burden on the State would be adding a sheet of paper to the recipient's case file. More jobs, and [I]less[/I] taxpayer money spent....instead of our usual formula of throwing away money in the name of job creation. [/QUOTE]

Verification