Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Election 2012
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="justanotherpatriot" data-source="post: 1827211" data-attributes="member: 24587"><p>Not so!!! As long as they upheld the Constitution and the Rule of Law I wouldn't have anything to worry about. Totally due in fact to the way our founding fathers organized the principles of this country. By the way, as I heard it, they already have a majority in the Detroit area or the suburbs. That is exactly why a comprehensive understanding of our country's founding principles are so critical and why erosion of those principles are to be avoided at all costs.</p><p>Also why the current actions by our sitting President are so untennable. His job description carries 2 mandates as conditions of the job. #1 Uphold the Rule of Law. #2 Provide for the common defense of the Country. His actions this last week in publicly proclaiming that there were provisions of the law that he was deliberately not going to enforce blatantly violates his oath of office. His actions or policy with F&F (whether he was personally involved at the time or he is aiding and abetting in the cover up that is following) are in direct contention with the 2nd mandate. For anyone who claims to be a 2a supporter not to recognize the blatant back door attempt that this was at gun control---in the words of certain poster--- well, well, well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="justanotherpatriot, post: 1827211, member: 24587"] Not so!!! As long as they upheld the Constitution and the Rule of Law I wouldn't have anything to worry about. Totally due in fact to the way our founding fathers organized the principles of this country. By the way, as I heard it, they already have a majority in the Detroit area or the suburbs. That is exactly why a comprehensive understanding of our country's founding principles are so critical and why erosion of those principles are to be avoided at all costs. Also why the current actions by our sitting President are so untennable. His job description carries 2 mandates as conditions of the job. #1 Uphold the Rule of Law. #2 Provide for the common defense of the Country. His actions this last week in publicly proclaiming that there were provisions of the law that he was deliberately not going to enforce blatantly violates his oath of office. His actions or policy with F&F (whether he was personally involved at the time or he is aiding and abetting in the cover up that is following) are in direct contention with the 2nd mandate. For anyone who claims to be a 2a supporter not to recognize the blatant back door attempt that this was at gun control---in the words of certain poster--- well, well, well. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Law & Order
Election 2012
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom