Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Classifieds
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's New?
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More Options
Advertise with us
Contact Us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
Ergo F93 Pro VS Magpul UBR
Search titles only
By:
Reply to Thread
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="de-evoproject" data-source="post: 1287830" data-attributes="member: 14169"><p>Hey guys, I'm just getting started on my AR15 build and though i had it all laid out. I was completely sold on the Magpul UBR simply because of the static cheek weld, rock solid stability and high quality build. Wasn't thrilled about the price but willing to pay for quality. </p><p></p><p>Now I found the Ergo F93 pro stock (apparently this was previously made by Magpul as the M93 series)which has all the same features just without the battery compartment, "Magpul" name and slicked down looks. And its about $125 cheaper. </p><p></p><p>Now i'm an ex-soldier, "pretty" guns hold nothing for me. Expensive name brands don't mean crap to me. I go for quality and functionability (though sometimes these are name brand items, like Magpul). Plus i'm building a gun with combat not competition in mind. Since i can't find any comparitve articles or reviews, i'm asking you guys.</p><p></p><p>Out of the guys here that have shot both, how do you feel about them? Is the Magpul overwhelmingly more stable and smooth operating? Or are they close enough you would say the Ergo is a good buy?</p><p></p><p>I've actually handled and shouldered the UBR so i know i like it, but never saw an Ergo in person. To all the guys who maybe have shot the Ergo but not the Magpul, what is your impression? How would you rate it? If you didn't like it as far as function, why?</p><p></p><p>I really appreciate any info guys, thanks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="de-evoproject, post: 1287830, member: 14169"] Hey guys, I'm just getting started on my AR15 build and though i had it all laid out. I was completely sold on the Magpul UBR simply because of the static cheek weld, rock solid stability and high quality build. Wasn't thrilled about the price but willing to pay for quality. Now I found the Ergo F93 pro stock (apparently this was previously made by Magpul as the M93 series)which has all the same features just without the battery compartment, "Magpul" name and slicked down looks. And its about $125 cheaper. Now i'm an ex-soldier, "pretty" guns hold nothing for me. Expensive name brands don't mean crap to me. I go for quality and functionability (though sometimes these are name brand items, like Magpul). Plus i'm building a gun with combat not competition in mind. Since i can't find any comparitve articles or reviews, i'm asking you guys. Out of the guys here that have shot both, how do you feel about them? Is the Magpul overwhelmingly more stable and smooth operating? Or are they close enough you would say the Ergo is a good buy? I've actually handled and shouldered the UBR so i know i like it, but never saw an Ergo in person. To all the guys who maybe have shot the Ergo but not the Magpul, what is your impression? How would you rate it? If you didn't like it as far as function, why? I really appreciate any info guys, thanks. [/QUOTE]
Insert Quotes…
Verification
Post Reply
Forums
The Range
Rifle & Shotgun Discussion
Ergo F93 Pro VS Magpul UBR
Search titles only
By:
Top
Bottom